Free trade earn money

What is freetrade app? Not at the moment. Robinhood, a similar app which launched in the US in 2013 and also offers “commission-free” trading, has “indefinitely postponed” its UK launch.

My list of forex bonuses

Freetrade makes it easier to lose your money on the stock market, free trade earn money.

The company announced in august that it had regulatory approval to operate as a broker in the UK and it planned to allow UK customers to buy and sell shares from 2020.

Freetrade makes it easier to lose your money on the stock market

gordon gekko and bud fox holding a phone with freetrade

Gordon gecko. The wolf of wall street. Christian bale’s portrayal of michael burry in the big short. These characters embody the public idea of ruthless finance types who will use every trick in the book – including cheating pensioners out of their money – to make their own millions.

To that roster of characters I’d like to add me, conrad quilty-harper, blogger, digital editor and the proud owner of £636.36 worth of stocks, commodities and bonds. I’m not going to make millions with my tiny pot of money, but to own those shares at least I didn’t have to move to wall street, don a double-breasted suit or set up an ISDA master agreement*: I simply downloaded an app on my phone.

This is a review of freetrade.Io, a new app, based in london, which allows its users to access a selection of shares available to buy in the UK and abroad. With a few touches and a thumb press, you can buy and sell shares, and have a very good reason to reinstall the ios stocks app.

Of course it’s always been relatively easy to buy shares if you really wanted to. Moneysavingexpert has a brilliant list of some affordable options. The difference with freetrade is that, as the name suggests, it’s free to trade.

When the app launched, free trades used to be limited to 4PM every day, and you had to pay £1 per trade if you want to do it “instantly.” they’ve since made instant trading free. That compares remarkably favourably with existing competitors like AJ bell (from £1.50 a trade), interactive investor (£7.99), X-O (£5.95) and hargreaves lansdown (£5.95, but you have to make more than 20 trades in one month). Some of these more established companies have reduced their prices since freetrade launched, but that also might be to do with commission-free trading options from revolut and etoro, and low fee options trading apps like BUX and degiro.

What none of those more expensive or complicated options offer is a process as seamless as freetrade. If you have online banking already, to gain access it’s only slightly more complicated than signing up for netflix. Put in your details, your national insurance number, transfer some money to a bank account, and within a few days you’re able to buy shares.

I’ll use this animated gif to show you how many touches it takes to sell my £13 worth of vodafone shares.

The app still isn’t perfect, nearly two years since its launch. It does a lot of those annoying fintech things like not put an axis on its charts (WHY?!) and uses language that developers think are cute but actually make you question whether you should give them your money at all (e.G. BT’s listing in the app is described as “slow internet”). On the other hand, when I encountered a bug they fixed it within a day and sent me a chat message within the app.

I signed up to freetrade simply to play around with the app, but as the app has developed and the company continues to add new shares (the roadmap is quite comprehensive) it has started to replace my other investment platforms. I’ve even invested in the app itself via one of its crowdcube funding rounds.

One final thing: freetrade made me realise how poor most of the news and information is there about the stock market for retail investors. You can use the ios stocks app, for instance, but that often has no recent news about relevant companies. A better source is the FT’s markets section, but again their coverage isn’t universal. Surely there’s an opportunity there…

More information about freetrade and investing apps in the UK

Can I use robinhood in the UK?

Not at the moment. Robinhood, a similar app which launched in the US in 2013 and also offers “commission-free” trading, has “indefinitely postponed” its UK launch. The company announced in august that it had regulatory approval to operate as a broker in the UK and it planned to allow UK customers to buy and sell shares from 2020.

What is freetrade app?

Freetrade is a stock and shares investment smartphone app which allows you to trade for free. The company is still an early stage start-up, and has raised money several times using crowdfunding platform crowdcube. More than 200,000 people have accounts with freetrade, and it’s been operating for nearly two years.

How can I trade for free?

It’s possible to trade “for free” using freetrade, a mobile app which lets you invest in a limited selection of stocks, shares and exchange traded funds (etfs).

How can I get freetrade?

Sign up to freetrade with my referral code link and if you’re a new customer and put at least £1 into your account, you’ll get a free share. Here’s some more information about the offer.

Further reading if you’re interested in finance

(this blog was originally published in december 2018. *A plot point in the big short.)

Free trade earn money

The cost of buying and selling shares has fallen steeply since the start of the 2000s thanks to a digital revolution.

In the not too distance past, investors who wanted to buy and sell stocks and shares would have to do this through a stockbroker or a financial adviser who took a sizeable chunk of commission with every deal.

But times changed and online DIY investing platforms give investors the ability to buy and sell at their fingertips, whether from the comfort of their computer or even their phone.

The cost of buying and selling shares has fallen over time, but still remains sizeable at some platforms, with hargreaves lansdown charging £11.95, interactive investor £10 and AJ bell £9.95. Halifax-owned iweb deserves and honorable mention as it charges just £5

Trading 212 and freetrade both have an eye-catching offer designed to pull customers in: neither charges a penny to buy or sell shares.

But why offer this and who are these two firms?

For trading 212, it was a case of adding another string to its bow when contracts for difference (CFD) trading - one of its flagship offerings and main revenue driver -was hit by a regulatory crackdown.

A CFD is a form of derivative trading that allows you to speculate on the rising or falling prices of global financial markets, such as forex, indices, commodities, shares and treasuries. It carries a higher level of risk compared to conventional shares and bonds investments.

Crucially, investors do not buy shares but use derivatives to either simply mimic prices, or magnify moves through the use of leverage, as borrowed money is known.

New european rules, which came into effect in august last year, have reduced the amount CFD traders can leverage, as concern grew that big losses were being incurred by inexperienced investors. Britain's financial watchdog, the FCA is also tightening rules. These measures have trimmed CFD platforms's prospectts.

Trading 212 became the first retail broker in britain to introduced a commission-free share dealing service in 2017.

In the case of freetrade, commission-free share dealing, either through a standard account or isa, is the only service the digital broker currently offers. It plans to expand into new areas in future. It's free to open an isa account until july 2019. The cost will be £3 thereafter.

Both challenger investment platforms have adopted this model as a carrot to tempt customers away from established rivals, such as hargreaves lansdown, interactive investor and AJ bell.

The average commission charged by five of the largest online share-dealing platforms run at £8.31 per trade, with leading brokers such as hargreaves lansdown and interactive investor charging £11.95 and £10 respectively, according to DJB research.

Commission-free sharing dealing looks set to further disrupt a market that is already experiencing a downward pressure on investment fees amid regulatory pressure.

Where can you invest?

It's worth noting that freetrade's and trading 212 respective investment universe is relatively small compared to that of more established rivals.

A total of 335 stocks, etfs and investment trusts sit on the freetrade platform. The selection comprises of 122 US stocks and 136 UK securities - including 33 investment trusts and 44 etfs. The firm expects to increase this figure on an ongoing basis.

Meanwhile, trading 212 hosts more than 1,800 investment opportunities comprising shares in companies based in the UK, the US and in some european markets, as well as etfs.

To put this into perspective, hargreaves lansdown offers 1,643 UK shares, 7,184 overseas shares, 1,170 etfs and 386 investment trusts.

Crucially, neither trading 212 or freetrade allow you to invest in investment funds or individual corporate bonds outside an ETF.

Hargreaves, meanwhile, hosts 470 corporate bonds plus 7,099 funds from the UK and abroad.

Both trading 212 and freetrade offer an isa wrapper, but neither offer a self invested personal pension.

How do these platforms make money?

Ivan ashminov, co-founder of trading 212, told this is money that actual trading costs are less than £1, so waiving trading commission does not have a detrimental effect.

The charges levied on the platform's other services should more than cover a shortfall from these costs, he added.

Things to consider before moving platform

Investors are free to move DIY investing platform and should track down the one that is best for their needs.

However, they need to be aware of fees for moving from their existing platform and from one they sign up to if they don't like it.

Investors should calculate the potential annual saving they would make by switching and a reasonable expectation of investment growth under the new platform against the cost of moving and any exit fees.

Things like customer services offered by the respective platforms may seem like a small detail but can make the world of difference.

Trading 212 adopts a 'freemium' model - like mobile games that are free to download but have in app purchases - in the hope that some customers will shell out for additional services that it develops down the line, such as robo-advice on which stocks to buy.

Customers of newcomer freetrade can only trade shares without incurring a broker charge if transacted outside an isa wrapper through it's 'basic trade' service.

Basic trade means the buys and sells are aggregated and dealt around 4pm every day.

This isn't a huge problem if you plan on holding shares for a long time, but more experienced investors often want to be able to trade instantly at a set price.

Free trades are never quite free

There is no such thing as a free trade. Period.

This is because of a concept called the bid-offer spread, which is essentially the gap between the highest price a buyer is willing to pay you for shares and the lowest price a seller is willing to sell them to you for.

You will pay closer to the higher price to purchase a share and sell nearer the lower price.

The size of the gap depends on how liquid a share is, ie how easy it is to buy and sell, and larger companies therefore tend to have tighter spreads.

These prices are different to the mid-price, which is the one you will generally see quoted in market reports and headline share data.

At the time of publication, shares in tesco were trading at 234.05p, however, the offer was 234.1 and the bid was 234p. The spread here is 0.04 per cent. Another cost in buying shares is stamp duty charged at 0.5 per cent.

When buying a foreign stock, you'll also have factor in the cost of the converting currency. Trading 212 passes on the charge at the spot rate. Whereas freetrade charges spot rate plus 0.45 per cent on these transactions.

Freetrade was founded back in 2015 but officially launched its commission-free share dealing app in september 2018.

Will commission-free trading free trade last?

That's dependent on whether the model can pull enough people for these companies to make money off other things they charge for.

At some point, the platform's respective financial backers will want some return on their investment, and zero commission trading removes a major source of revenue.

Commission-free share trading is novel, but eventually investors might crave a more expansive investment universe, with access to more shares, funds and investment trusts.

So the main challenge for these platforms in future may be to keep hold of the customers they've lured in through the zero-commission share trading service by adding new features that complement their evolution as investors.

Both trading 212 and freetrade are legitimate digital stockbrokers, authorised and regulated by the FCA.

If either platforms ever go under, your investments are covered by up to £85,000 (up from £50,000 as of 1 april) under the financial services compensation scheme safety net.

The saying 'there's no such thing as a free lunch' certainly applies here. While basic share dealing services are free any bells and whistles cost more and there is the spread and tax to take into account.

Also, free trading may tempt you to change your investment style and invest more frequently than necessary. Doing so can increase internal costs and potentially hinder your long-term returns.

When weighing up the right platform to invest for you, it's important to look at the service that it offers, along with administration charges and dealing fees, plus any other extra costs.

DIY INVESTING CHARGES SNAPSHOT

provider	admin charge	charges notes	fund dealing	standard share, investment trusts, ETF dealing	regular investing	dividend reinvestment
trading 212	n/a	-	n/a	free (investment trust trades unavailable)	n/a	n/a	more details
freetrade	n/a	-	n/a	free	n/a	n/a	more details
hargreaves lansdown	0.45%	capped at £45 a year for shares, trusts, etfs	free	£11.95	£1.50	1% (£1 min, £10 max)	more details
barclays direct investing*	0.2% on funds, 0.1% on other investments	min monthly fee £4, max £125	£3	£6	£1	free	more details
share centre	£57.60	-	1% £7.50 min	1% £7.50 min	0.5%, min £1	0.5%, min £1	more details

Trading 212

Trading 212, which was founded in bulgaria 16 years ago, has operated an online commodities and currency trading platform in the UK for five years. The firm became the first retail broker in britain to introduced a commission-free share dealing service in 2017.

The service, now called, trading 212 invest, provides access to stocks and etfs across the world’s leading stock exchanges and currencies, including cryptocurrencies, like bitcoin, and commodities.

Trading 212 doesn't levy an administration fees on trades, the only costs to be aware of are the bid-ask spread and the foreign exchange spot price when trading shares overseas. Money held in an isa incurs no additional charge.

Freetrade

Freetrade was founded back in 2015 by adam dodds, a former KPMG manager, but officially launched its commission-free share dealing app in september 2018.

In order to offer fee-free trading, freetrade got an FCA licence and joined the london stock exchange in order to processes its own 'basic' orders in bulk each day at 4pm.

The online broker does not levy for trades that are aggregated and dealt around 4pm every day. UK and US shares cost £1 to trade instantly and a foreign exchange charge which comprises of the spot rate (the price quoted for immediate settlement on a commodity, a security or a currency) plus 0.45 per cent.

Isas are currently free until july 2019 but will cost users £3 a month thereafter. Transferring money out of either an isa or general account into a bank account cost £5 a pop. The bid-ask spread costs also apply.

Coming soon? Etoro and revolut

Etoro could be the next the latest investment platform to launch a commission-free share dealing platform.

Users will be able to trade 1,340 shares that sit on the platform without incurring a broker fee. A spokesman for the firm said the service will land before the end of summer and it won't cap users' amount of free trading.

Digital-only bank revolut is also building a commission-free trading platform on its app, its latest bid to use technology to undercut traditional financial services.

Revolut said users will be able to buy and sell listed stocks in seconds, without paying commission. The firm said the product would generate income from premium subscriptions, which will give perks to paying customers, as well as margin trading, securities lending and interest on cash held. No release date has been given.

Freetrade review

As of 01/09/2020 at 2:26 pm

Holly's view

Freetrade does a good job of offering a low-cost, mobile-first trading app that is simple to use and looks slick. For investors who are happy to bulk trade once a day, this could be an amazingly cheap way to access the market, buying and holding 1 x ETF for £3 a month administration fee in an ISA. There are glitches and we have run into problems a few times, which have also been addressed quickly with notifications and updates on chat. Feels like there are a few teething issues behind the interface but it’s a nice service and has a loyal and social millennial following.

Our rating

How our ratings work

We score each provider on about 20 different criteria including cost, service, website, functionality, customer feedback and our experience of the service. All overseen by our phd gonk!

Recommended for

In a nutshell

Basic account and trades free

You say

Your overall rating

How your ratings work

Don’t want to take our word for it? We ask existing customers and investors to rate their experience with the company – based on value for money, overall service and the website. We need at least 20 customer reviews before we add anyone to our best buys list.

Your ISA and pension reviews

Transfer of money into the freetrade account from the bank account doesn't always happen. Sometimes the transaction has to be carried out twice. It is not an immediate transfer, unlike trading 212.

It is in the name, free trades, large-ish selection of stocks and etfs and relatively simple app. Not much info on each stock, you'd have to go elsewhere for that

Very fast adapting app with excellent customer service. Lots more exciting features in the pipeline, cant see myself ever moving to another broker.

Very strong platform which does everything you need it to do if you are looking for a 'cheap as chips' way to start and manage a portfolio across UK & US stocks. Huge recent investment and constant releases are driving significantly improved product quality every 4-8 weeks and you would have to bet that it will match the traditional trading platforms within 12 months a a fraction of the cost. Highly recommended.

I moved my ISA from hargreaves lansdown to freetrade. Not because of the incredible userability, but because I worked out trading on HL brought my average cost up 4/5% as well as charging numerous other fees, including fees on sale. Freetrade still has a long way to go but it has already come so far in such a short space of time!

Freetrade's app is great. Very easy to use and no nonsense. I used interactive investor before, and it was horrible experience. Strongly recommend freetrade.

Fantastic app allowing you to invest with "zero" commissions. ISA product is also a great addition with a low monthly fee compared to higher cost incumbent UK brokers. Great universe of US and UK stocks, etfs and investment trusts expanding every week. Exceptional customer service via the in-app chat with quick and thoughtful responsiveness.

Got set up in less than 30 minutes. Bought stocks with apple pay instantly and the UI is amazing.

10/10! And getting better all the time. The future of trading!

I have been with them for nearly 2 years. A few glitches at the beginning but service response was excellent. Would recommend to all investing beginners. I have invested in 2 crowdcube fund raisings. That’s how confident I am in them. No research available but this can easily be done elsewhere and sure will come eventually. Forum excellent as well.

Fantastic app! No fees at all. Unbelievable service.

The inability to post a limit order is a major drawback.

Really simple to use with a great looking interface. It's also much cheaper that some other stockbrokers.

Great app. Simple, low cost and rapidly evolving. If you want complex trading graphs this is not for you but for medium term investors with an eye on costs it good today and is constantly improving with new features. My experience of customer service has been swift.

Incredible app that makes investing easy and simple!

Really happy with the app and feel like it's helped me gain control of my investments. I can see my transactions and performance at a glance (unlike with my previous broker). It feels like it's developing very quickly with new things added frequently like portfolio insights, dividend info, enhancements to stock searches and adding new stocks. Customer service also answer on the weekends.

Customer service is excellent, is a very easy to use service for investing in the stock market. It's very cheap for a great app. Their offering is still getting better.

Great app, easy to use, free if you don’t need instant trading and only £1 if you do - hargreaves charged over £10 for the same service. The stock universe is growing quickly too, I haven’t bought a share elsewhere since I opened my account.

Great team, fabulous UI and a business model well aligned with their customers.

Great app, zero commission trading. FSCS protected to normal limits. Customer support have always been good with me.

Freetrade provides an excellent fee free investing experience. The UI is really nice and the app is constantly being updated with new features.

I’ve been investing on freetrade for over a year now. It’s what I’ve been wanting in an investment platform for many years. Fantastic!

Great app and value for money (it's free!). Regular feature updates will ensure it gains in value over time. Upcoming fractional shares will be a game changer.

Great product and no fees!

Brilliant easy to use website.

A great app that has opened up the world of investing to everyone.

Awful all round. Poor range, missing major stocks like IAG. Orders so basic that they sometimes take days to execute. No limit/stop loss orders nor other basic broker features such as a web portal. Worst of all, the ISA's more expensive than traditional brokers, such as hargreaves lansdown, for beginners with the least to invest. Avoid.

An ISA account costs £36/year (it’s free with other competitors), which eats significantly into profits for small accounts (supposedly their target). There are no stop loss or limit orders, instant trades are not free unlike other competitors and there are very few available shares. If these things are mentioned in their community, the customer is banned with the accuse of ‘shilling’. Do not recommend.

Very simple but yet so powerful! Easy application to use & navigate with wide range of US/UK stocks! Customer service are outstanding, very professional and helpful!

Good designed product, improving features, lets you start your investment journey with little as a £1. No trades fees, no custody fees, no cuts into your investment giving you a real boast and chance to grow.

Brilliant and easy app with fantastic staff. Keep it up.

Freetrade as a simple proposition, lowering the barriers of investing for everyone. They have a beautiful and intuitive mobile app and the fact that you pay no commission on basic trades is a amazing! Customer service is top notch and fast! Love the product and the team behind the app!

Having been a longtime ajbell investor, I recently switched over to freetrade and I am incredibly impressed by what they provide. Buying shares and efts incurred no fees, and was so simple on the app. When I did have an issue the customer service responded in minutes! Highly recommend to anyone looking to start investing, or those who previously used one of the legacy providers. They are shortly launching fractional trading which will enable you to buy small chunks of shares which will be great for beginners.

Very clean easy to use, love the whole design. The staff are very knowledgeable.

Simple, easy to use tool that allows cost-effective access to trading even to those who don't have huge sums to invest.

Solid app, solid company. Really nice and easy to use but as was said by many others before it currently suffers from being hard to properly utilize for new investors who might not know much about the subject.

I’ve been using freetrade for over a year. In that time I’ve seen it evolve from a good app to a great app. It’s one of two financial apps I open every day (the other being monzo). Functionally it is excellent and it’s also incredible value for money. Their stock universe is growing weekly and the functionality coming will be revolutionary. As an organisation they are very open, transparent and community focused. Ten out of ten from me - absolute convert to this style of investing.

Miles ahead of the traditional brokers in terms of cost and service. Free, great customer service, really aesthetic UI. Only improvements I’d mention are speed of top-ups etc, but these are already in the works. For a relatively recently rolled out service, you couldn’t really ask for much more. Does exactly what it says on the tin. But better.

It gets the basics done well. Looking forward to limit orders and to be moved to their new and improved platform before I can give 5/5.

Very simple to invest in stocks and shares with very clear costs, which in most cases are none! Interface is very easy to use and quick to check on how your investments are performing.

What to expect

Investor choice awards 2020

Ease of use

Mobile & apps

Behind the scenes

Online investment service:

Highly commended

Despite its name and marketed USP, freetrade's fans are much more likely to cite ease of use than price as what the provider is best at.

Roughly 53% of voters chose ease of use, around 35% chose price, and about 11% selected service.

The app is limited but clearly designed. It is simple to navigate, with all necessary information easily accessible due to the tabs at the bottom of the screen.

Freetrade is a mobile only provider, with a strong, clear interface that allows users to trade effortlessly. It has been noticeably designed with smartphone users in mind, successfully emulating the style and efficiency that mobile users have become accustomed too in their daily lives.

We ran into a few glitches when setting up our account. But once the account was set up and funded it works smoothly enough and trading is straightforward.

Investment choice

Products

Investments available

Investment help

The 'geeky' details

Provider details

The new kid on the block – freetrade launched on ios in october 2018 and on android as recently as april 2019. The app is easy to use, with a rapid set up time and a strong user interface. The basic account is free, with a stocks & shares ISA priced at £3 per month. Freetrade gives you access to etfs and stocks, but has no ready-made options and don’t offer funds. Freetrade’s USP is in their name – trades are absolutely free. For frequent traders, this is a dream come true, representing huge potential savings when compared with more widely known providers.

On the flip side, that’s about all you can do. The research capabilities are severely limited, with only a basic interactive chart showing stock performance across different periods. For keen investors who like to even moderately understand a stock’s background before buying it; look elsewhere!

Important facts & figures

Corporate stuff

About boring money

In the media

Meet the team

How our ratings work

How we make money

Advertise with boring money

Holly's investments

Privacy, cookies & data

Sitemap

Contact

Holly's blog

Join the 10,000+ people who get our weekly blog

Our weekly musings on money, great products, top tips and a dollop of opinion.

Follow BM for regular snippets

Boring money business

Important stuff: holly and the team have worked in the finance industry for many years but we are not regulated to give you personal financial advice, nor are we regulated by the industry watchdog (although we do talk to them a lot). For every story on this site about a good investment, or something which went up by 10% or made someone £200, we could share a story about a bad investment, something which fell by 10% or lost someone £200. Nothing’s certain when investing so if you’re really unsure, or dealing with complicated stuff like working out what to do with a pension when you retire, we’d really suggest you get some financial advice. Here are some tips on how to pick a good financial adviser. Or check out unbiased or vouchedfor. Just remember, commission has been banned now so advisers need to be very clear with you about what you are paying them and when.

Sign up for holly's blog

Stay up to date

Our free weekly blog with holly's
no-nonsense opinions, tips & food for thought.
If you change your mind, you can unsubscribe at any time. We'll never share your details and you can unsubscribe any time.

UK and singapore sign free trade deal

The UK has signed a free trade deal with singapore, international trade secretary liz truss said.

Ms truss said in a statement on twitter that the pact will cover trade worth £17.6 billion.

Alongside a photograph of herself with singapore’s trade minister chan chun sing, ms truss said it was the second biggest such agreement britain has signed in the asia-pacific region.

It comes as UK and EU negotiators begin a final push to salvage chances of a post-brexit trade deal after downing street warned that the gaps between the two sides remain “very large”.

Prime minister boris johnson and european commission president ursula von der leyen held crunch talks over dinner in brussels on wednesday aimed at breaking the deadlock, yet key differences prevail.

Today I signed a deal with singapore covering £17.6bn of trade – the 2nd biggest agreement we’ve signed in #asiapacific ��
✅it secures certainty for biz✅means deeper future ties in digital & services trade✅ is further proof we can succeed as an independent trading nation pic.Twitter.Com/6pmlqb7v9b
— liz truss (@trussliz) december 10, 2020

Ms truss said the pact with singapore “secures certainty” for business, will mean “deeper future ties in digital and services trade” and is “further proof we can succeed as an independent trading nation”.

It follows the UK and canada reaching a deal last month to continue trading under the same terms as the current european union agreement after the brexit transition period ends.

The singapore deal largely mirrors the one the city-state has with the EU, effectively allowing trade to continue as before after january 1.

Alongside the continuity deal with singapore, the two countries also intend to launch negotiations on a digital economy agreement.

Ms truss is also expected to sign a rollover deal with vietnam to ensure trade continues on the same terms after january 1.

She said: “both these agreements are vital for the UK’s future as an independent trading nation.

“not only do they lock in billions of pounds worth of trade, they also pave the way for new digital partnerships and joining the trans-pacific partnership.

“this will play to the UK’s strengths, as we become a hub for tech and digital trade with influence far beyond our shores, defining our role in the world for decades to come.”

How forex brokers make money

In the foreign exchange market, traders and speculators buy and sell various currencies based on whether they think the currency will appreciate or lose value. The foreign exchange, or forex market is high risk and sees more than $5 trillion traded daily. Traders have to go through an intermediary such as a forex broker to execute trades. No matter the gains or losses sustained by individual traders, forex brokers make money on commissions and fees, some of them hidden. Understanding how forex brokers make money can help you in choosing the right broker.

Role of the foreign exchange broker

A foreign-exchange broker takes orders to buy or sell currencies and executes them. Forex brokers typically operate on the over-the-counter, or OTC, market. This is a market that is not subject to the same regulations as other financial exchanges, and the forex broker may not be subject to many of the rules that govern securities transactions. There is also no centralized clearing mechanism in this market, which means you will have to be careful that your counterparty does not default. Make sure that you investigate the counterparty and his capitalization before you proceed. Be vigilant in choosing a reliable forex broker.

Forex broker fees

In return for executing buy or sell orders, the forex broker will charge a commission per trade or a spread. That is how forex brokers make their money. A spread is a difference between the bid price and the ask price for the trade. The bid price is the price you will receive for selling a currency, while the ask price is the price you will have to pay for buying a currency. The difference between the bid and ask price is the broker’s spread. A broker could also charge both a commission and a spread on a trade. Some brokers may claim to offer commission-free trades. These brokers probably make a commission by widening the spread on trades.

The spread could also be either fixed or variable. In the case of a variable spread, the spread will vary depending on how the market moves. A major market event, such as a change in interest rates, could cause the spread to change. This could either be favorable or unfavorable to you. If the market gets volatile, you could end up paying much more than you expected. Another aspect to note is that a forex broker could have a different spread for buying a currency and for selling the same currency. Thus you have to pay close attention to pricing.

In general, the brokers who are well-capitalized and work with a number of large foreign exchange dealers to get competitive quotes typically offer competitive pricing.

Risks of foreign exchange trading

It is possible to trade on margin by depositing a small amount as a margin requirement. This introduces a lot of risk in the foreign exchange market for both the trader and the broker. For example, in january 2015, the swiss national bank stopped supporting the euro peg, causing the swiss franc to appreciate considerably versus the euro. traders caught on the wrong side of this trade lost their money and were not able to make good on the margin requirements, resulting in some brokers suffering catastrophic losses and even going into bankruptcy. Inexperienced traders could also get caught up in a fat finger error, such as the one that was blamed for the 6% dip of the british pound in 2016.

The bottom line

Those contemplating trading in the forex market will have to proceed cautiously—many foreign-exchange traders have lost money as a result of fraudulent get-rich schemes that promise great returns in this thinly regulated market. The forex market is not one in which prices are transparent, and each broker has his own quoting method. It is up to those who are transacting in this market to investigate their broker pricing to ensure that they are getting a good deal.

How to make money from home – earn up to £1,000 online without leaving your sofa

Savvy bloggers have revealed their best tips on how you can earn serious money from the comfort of your home

SAVVY savers have revealed how you can make money online from home - with the potential to bag nearly £1,000 a month.

Following a potentially difficult few months after the coronavirus pandemic gripped the UK, many families will be tightening their belts - but it's possible to earn extra cash without putting in too much effort.

Bloggers and savvy savers have revealed the ways you can make money without even leaving home

The sun asked bloggers and money savers on social media for their insider tricks for boosting your coffers that could help you save some serious cash.

A typical household spends more than £2,500 per month, according to the bank of england, so anything to add to our earnings is welcome in our books.

We've worked out that if you did all nine tips on this list, you would earn £982.

This is how they manage to earn the extra cash - and how you can do the same.

Lynn james, mrs mummy penny, on earning cashback and completing tasks for money

Mrs Mummy Penny, aka Lynn James, says she has a few ways of earning money on the sly

Lynn james, 41, of hertfordshire, is the founder of the mrs mummy penny blog whose aim is to make personal finance seem simple and to suggest lifestyle choices that could save you money.

1. Earning cashback

I love topcashback and have been a regular user for more than five years now.
Whenever I buy anything online I go to topcashback first and click through to the website from there, which triggers a payment.

That might be £60 cashback when switching broadband or £100 cashback when booking a holiday using expedia.

2. Complete tasks for money

Money-earning website 20cogs gets you to complete 20 tasks over a period of a few weeks.
They can be things like questionnaires and signing up to offers, but all can be cancelled at no cost.
I tried it and made £180 after completing the 20 tasks.

EARNINGS: £180

Deepak tailor, latestfreestuff founder and latestdeals co-founder, on lucrative sign-ups and getting paid to share deals

Deepak tailor is the founder of latestfreestuff, a website that tells people about freebies and samples up for grabs. He's also the co-founder of latestdeals, a community of people who find deals and share them.

1. Share deals and get paid

Latestdeals will hand out vouchers for people who share deals on its website.

You get points which add up to amazon vouchers for your contributions.

Top members earn more than £500 per month just for sharing deals they find online.

It's free to sign up and most people earn their first voucher within the first month.

EARNINGS: £500

2. Earn £15 by referring your friends

Plum is a chatbot app which automates savings for you. You can connect their app to your bank account and you'll get £15 in cash if you successfully refer three friends who sign up. It's super quick and easy.

EARNINGS: £15

3. Install an app

With ipsos media cell - consumer data tracking software - you will earn a £20 voucher just by installing an app on your phone.

You then get £10 every month you keep it installed on your phone. I've tried it myself and it works well.

EARNINGS: £20, and £10 every month

4. Take a survey

Pinecone research pays £3 per survey you complete.

The company asks for your opinions on products across health, home, kids and sport, enabling you to accumulate points.

You can then redeem the points for cash or prizes.

EARNINGS: £3 per survey

5. Get paid for listening to music

Listen to music and slicethepie will reward up to 10p for every song you listen and rate.

The more you listen to and the more detailed your reviews, the more it will reward you.

EARNINGS: 10p per song - so if you listen to 100 songs, you'll earn £10

Members of the sun's money saving deals and tips facebook page also came up with a few insider tricks.

1. Go mystery shopping

Several facebook users suggest going mystery shopping to earn extra cash.

There are dozens of companies you can mystery shop with. Moneysavingexpert forum users have put together a comprehensive guide to how you can start mystery shopping which has links to all the different companies.

Some suggest you can earn up to £2,000 per year by mystery shopping.

EARNINGS: £167 per month

2. Selling stuff on ebay

It's the oldest trick in the book but many of our money savers say they still sell their old unwanted items such as clothes and homeware on the auction website to earn extra cash.

You don't even need to go to the post office anymore as you can choose to have couriers pick up the items from your home.

Ebay will take a cut of whatever you make from selling your items though so it may be worth looking for other ways to flog your items, such as on gumtree or on facebook.

EARNINGS: depends on what you have!

How forex brokers make money

Role of the foreign exchange broker

Forex broker fees

In general, the brokers who are well-capitalized and work with a number of large foreign exchange dealers to get competitive quotes typically offer competitive pricing.

Risks of foreign exchange trading

The bottom line

What is free trade? Definition, theories, pros, and cons

Collage of uncertainty forecasting global currency

In the simplest of terms, free trade is the total absence of government policies restricting the import and export of goods and services. While economists have long argued that trade among nations is the key to maintaining a healthy global economy, few efforts to actually implement pure free-trade policies have ever succeeded. What exactly is free trade, and why do economists and the general public view it so differently?

Key takeaways: free trade

Free trade is the unrestricted importing and exporting of goods and services between countries.

The opposite of free trade is protectionism—a highly-restrictive trade policy intended to eliminate competition from other countries.

Today, most industrialized nations take part in hybrid free trade agreements (ftas), negotiated multinational pacts which allow for, but regulate tariffs, quotas, and other trade restrictions.

Free trade definition

Free trade is a largely theoretical policy under which governments impose absolutely no tariffs, taxes, or duties on imports, or quotas on exports. In this sense, free trade is the opposite of protectionism, a defensive trade policy intended to eliminate the possibility of foreign competition.

In reality, however, governments with generally free-trade policies still impose some measures to control imports and exports. Like the united states, most industrialized nations negotiate “free trade agreements,” or ftas with other nations which determine the tariffs, duties, and subsidies the countries can impose on their imports and exports. For example, the north american free trade agreement (NAFTA), between the united states, canada, and mexico is one of the best-known ftas. Now common in international trade, FTA’s rarely result in pure, unrestricted free trade.

In 1948, the united states along with more than 100 other countries agreed to the general agreement on tariffs and trade (GATT), a pact that reduced tariffs and other barriers to trade between the signatory countries. In 1995, GATT was replaced by the world trade organization (WTO). Today, 164 countries, accounting for 98% of all world trade belong to the WTO.

Despite their participation in ftas and global trade organizations like the WTO, most governments still impose some protectionist-like trade restrictions such as tariffs and subsidies to protect local employment. For example, the so-called “chicken tax,” a 25% tariff on certain imported cars, light trucks, and vans imposed by president lyndon johnson in 1963 to protect U.S. Automakers remains in effect today.

Free trade theories

Since the days of the ancient greeks, economists have studied and debated the theories and effects of international trade policy. Do trade restrictions help or hurt the countries that impose them? And which trade policy, from strict protectionism to totally free trade is best for a given country? Through the years of debates over the benefits versus the costs of free trade policies to domestic industries, two predominant theories of free trade have emerged: mercantilism and comparative advantage.

Mercantilism

Mercantilism is the theory of maximizing revenue through exporting goods and services. The goal of mercantilism is a favorable balance of trade, in which the value of the goods a country exports exceeds the value of goods it imports. High tariffs on imported manufactured goods are a common characteristic of mercantilist policy. Advocates argue that mercantilist policy helps governments avoid trade deficits, in which expenditures for imports exceeds revenue from exports. For example, the united states, due to its elimination of mercantilist policies over time, has suffered a trade deficit since 1975.

Dominant in europe from the 16th to the 18th centuries, mercantilism often led to colonial expansion and wars. As a result, it quickly declined in popularity. Today, as multinational organizations such as the WTO work to reduce tariffs globally, free trade agreements and non-tariff trade restrictions are supplanting mercantilist theory.

Comparative advantage

Comparative advantage holds that all countries will always benefit from cooperation and participation in free trade. Popularly attributed to english economist david ricardo and his 1817 book “principles of political economy and taxation,” the law of comparative advantage refers to a country’s ability to produce goods and provide services at a lower cost than other countries. Comparative advantage shares many of the characteristics of globalization, the theory that worldwide openness in trade will improve the standard of living in all countries.

Comparative advantage is the opposite of absolute advantage—a country’s ability to produce more goods at a lower unit cost than other countries. Countries that can charge less for its goods than other countries and still make a profit are said to have an absolute advantage.

Pros and cons of free trade

Would pure global free trade help or hurt the world? Here are a few issues to consider.

5 advantages of free trade

It stimulates economic growth: even when limited restrictions like tariffs are applied, all countries involved tend to realize greater economic growth. For example, the office of the US trade representative estimates that being a signatory of NAFTA (the north american free trade agreement) increased the united states’ economic growth by 5% annually.

It helps consumers: trade restrictions like tariffs and quotas are implemented to protect local businesses and industries. When trade restrictions are removed, consumers tend to see lower prices because more products imported from countries with lower labor costs become available at the local level.

It increases foreign investment: when not faced with trade restrictions, foreign investors tend to pour money into local businesses helping them expand and compete. In addition, many developing and isolated countries benefit from an influx of money from U.S. Investors.

It reduces government spending: governments often subsidize local industries, like agriculture, for their loss of income due to export quotas. Once the quotas are lifted, the government’s tax revenues can be used for other purposes.

It encourages technology transfer: in addition to human expertise, domestic businesses gain access to the latest technologies developed by their multinational partners.

5 disadvantages of free trade

It causes job loss through outsourcing: tariffs tend to prevent job outsourcing by keeping product pricing at competitive levels. Free of tariffs, products imported from foreign countries with lower wages cost less. While this may be seemingly good for consumers, it makes it hard for local companies to compete, forcing them to reduce their workforce. Indeed, one of the main objections to NAFTA was that it outsourced american jobs to mexico.

It encourages theft of intellectual property: many foreign governments, especially those in developing countries, often fail to take intellectual property rights seriously. Without the protection of patent laws, companies often have their innovations and new technologies stolen, forcing them to compete with lower-priced domestically-made fake products.

It allows for poor working conditions: similarly, governments in developing countries rarely have laws to regulate and ensure safe and fair working conditions. Because free trade is partially dependent on a lack of government restrictions, women and children are often forced to work in factories doing heavy labor under grueling working conditions.

It can harm the environment: emerging countries have few, if any environmental protection laws. Since many free trade opportunities involve the exporting of natural resources like lumber or iron ore, clear-cutting of forests and un-reclaimed strip mining often decimate local environments.

It reduces revenues: due to the high level of competition spurred by unrestricted free trade, the businesses involved ultimately suffer reduced revenues. Smaller businesses in smaller countries are the most vulnerable to this effect.

In the final analysis, the goal of business is to realize a higher profit, while the goal of government is to protect its people. Neither unrestricted free trade nor total protectionism will accomplish both. A mixture of the two, as implemented by multinational free trade agreements, has evolved as the best solution.

Free trade

By alan S. Blinder

F or more than two centuries economists have steadfastly promoted free trade among nations as the best trade policy. Despite this intellectual barrage, many “practical” men and women continue to view the case for free trade skeptically, as an abstract argument made by ivory tower economists with, at most, one foot on terra firma. These practical people “know” that our vital industries must be protected from foreign competition .

The divergence between economists’ beliefs and those of (even well-educated) men and women on the street seems to arise in making the leap from individuals to nations. In running our personal affairs, virtually all of us exploit the advantages of free trade and comparative advantage without thinking twice. For example, many of us have our shirts laundered at professional cleaners rather than wash and iron them ourselves. Anyone who advised us to “protect” ourselves from the “unfair competition” of low-paid laundry workers by doing our own wash would be thought looney. Common sense tells us to make use of companies that specialize in such work, paying them with money we earn doing something we do better. We understand intuitively that cutting ourselves off from specialists can only lower our standard of living.

Adam smith
’s insight was that precisely the same logic applies to nations. Here is how he put it in 1776:

It is the maxim of every prudent master of a family, never to attempt to make at home what it will cost him more to make than to buy.. . . If a foreign country can supply us with a commodity cheaper than we ourselves can make it, better buy it of them with some part of the produce of our own industry, employed in a way in which we have some advantage.

Spain, south korea, and a variety of other countries manufacture shoes more cheaply than america can. They offer them for sale to us. Shall we buy them, as we buy the services of laundry workers, with money we earn doing things we do well—like writing computer software and growing wheat? Or shall we keep “cheap foreign shoes” out and purchase more expensive american shoes instead? It is pretty clear that the nation as a whole must be worse off if foreign shoes are kept out—even though the american shoe industry will be better off.

Most people accept this argument. But they worry about what happens if another country—say, china—can make everything, or almost everything, cheaper than we can. Will free trade with china then lead to unemployment for american workers, who will find themselves unable to compete with cheaper chinese labor? The answer (see comparative advantage ), which was provided by david ricardo in 1810, is no. To see why, let us once again appeal to our personal affairs.

Some lawyers are better typists than their secretaries. Should such a lawyer fire his secretary and do his own typing? Not likely. Though the lawyer may be better than the secretary at both arguing cases and typing, he will fare better by concentrating his energies on the practice of law and leaving the typing to a secretary. Such specialization not only makes the economy more efficient but also gives both lawyer and secretary productive work to do.

The same idea applies to nations. Suppose the chinese could manufacture everything more cheaply than we can—which is certainly not true. Even in this worst-case scenario, there will of necessity be some industries in which china has an overwhelming cost advantage (say, toys) and others in which its cost advantage is slight (say, computers). Under free trade the united states will produce most of the computers, china will produce most of the toys, and the two nations will trade. The two countries, taken together, will get both products cheaper than if each produced them at home to meet all of its domestic needs. And, what is also important, workers in both countries will have jobs.

Many people are skeptical about this argument for the following reason. Suppose the average american worker earns twenty dollars per hour while the average chinese worker earns just two dollars per hour. Won’t free trade make it impossible to defend the higher american wage? Won’t there instead be a leveling down until, say, both american and chinese workers earn eleven dollars per hour? The answer, once again, is no. And specialization is part of the reason.

If there were only one industry and occupation in which people could work, then free trade would indeed force american wages close to chinese levels if chinese workers were as good as americans. But modern economies are composed of many industries and occupations. If america concentrates its employment where it does best, there is no reason why american wages cannot remain far above chinese wages for a long time—even though the two nations trade freely. A country’s wage level depends fundamentally on the productivity of its labor force, not on its trade policy. As long as american workers remain more skilled and better educated, work with more capital, and use superior technology, they will continue to earn higher wages than their chinese counterparts. If and when these advantages end, the wage gap will disappear. Trade is a mere detail that helps ensure that american labor is employed where, in adam smith’s phrase, it has some advantage.

Those who are still not convinced should recall that china’s trade surplus with the united states has been widening precisely as the wage gap between the two countries, while still huge, has been narrowing. If cheap chinese labor was stealing american jobs, why did the theft intensify as the wage gap fell? The answer, of course, is that chinese productivity was growing at enormous rates. The remarkable upward march of chinese productivity both raised chinese wages relative to american wages and turned china into a world competitor. To think that we can forestall the inevitable by closing our borders is to participate in a cruel self-deception. Nor should there be any worry about failing to forestall the inevitable. The fact that another country becomes wealthier does not mean that americans must become poorer.

Americans should appreciate the benefits of free trade more than most people, for we inhabit the greatest free-trade zone in the world. Michigan manufactures cars; new york provides banking; texas pumps oil and gas. The fifty states trade freely with one another, and that helps them all enjoy great prosperity. Indeed, one reason why the united states did so much better economically than europe for more than two centuries is that america had free movement of goods and services while the european countries “protected” themselves from their neighbors. To appreciate the magnitudes involved, try to imagine how much your personal standard of living would suffer if you were not allowed to buy any goods or services that originated outside your home state.

A slogan occasionally seen on bumper stickers argues, “buy american, save your job.” this is grossly misleading for two main reasons. First, the costs of saving jobs in this particular way are enormous. Second, it is doubtful that any jobs are actually saved in the long run.

Many estimates have been made of the cost of “saving jobs” by protectionism . While the estimates differ widely across industries, they are almost always much larger than the wages of the protected workers. For example, one study in the early 1990s estimated that U.S. Consumers paid $1,285,000 annually for each job in the luggage industry that was preserved by barriers to imports, a sum that greatly exceeded the average earnings of a luggage worker. That same study estimated that restricting foreign imports cost $199,000 annually for each textile worker’s job that was saved, $1,044,000 for each softwood lumber job saved, and $1,376,000 for every job saved in the benzenoid chemical industry. Yes, $1,376,000 a year!

While americans may be willing to pay a price to save jobs, spending such enormous sums is plainly irrational. If you doubt that, imagine making the following offer to any benzenoid chemical worker who lost his job to foreign competition: we will give you severance pay of $1,376,000—not annually, but just once—in return for a promise never to seek work in the industry again. Can you imagine any worker turning down the offer? Is that not sufficient evidence that our present method of saving jobs is mad?

But the situation is actually worse, for a little deeper thought leads us to question whether any jobs are really saved overall. It is more likely that protectionist policies save some jobs by jeopardizing others. Why? First, protecting one american industry from foreign competition imposes higher costs on others. For example, quotas on imports of semiconductors sent the prices of memory chips skyrocketing in the 1980s, thereby damaging the computer industry. Steel quotas force U.S. Automakers to pay more for materials, making them less competitive.

Second, efforts to protect favored industries from foreign competition may induce reciprocal actions in other countries, thereby limiting american access to foreign markets. In that case, export industries pay the price for protecting import-competing industries.

Third, there are the little-understood, but terribly important, effects of trade barriers on the value of the dollar. If we successfully restrict imports, americans will spend less on foreign goods. With fewer dollars offered for sale on the world’s currency markets, the value of the dollar will rise relative to that of other currencies. At that point unprotected industries will start to suffer because a higher dollar makes U.S. Goods less competitive in world markets. Once again, america’s ability to export is harmed.

On balance the conclusion seems clear and compelling: while protectionism is sold as job saving, it probably really amounts to job swapping. It protects jobs in some industries only by destroying jobs in others.

About the author

Alan S. Blinder is the gordon S. Rentschler memorial professor of economics at princeton university. He wrote, from 1985 to 1992, a regular economics column for business week and is the coauthor of one of the best-selling textbooks on economics. He has served as vice chairman of the federal reserve’s board of governors and as a member of president bill clinton’s council of economic advisers.

So, let's see, what we have: freetrade makes it easier to lose your money on the stock market gordon gecko. The wolf of wall street. Christian bale’s portrayal of michael burry in the big short. These characters embody at free trade earn money